Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) persons in the U.S. state of Ohio face some legal challenges non-LGBT residents do not. Same-sex sexual activity is legal in Ohio. Families headed by same-sex spouses are eligible for the same protections available to different-sex spouses, but discrimination based on sexual orientation isn't banned statewide.
Video LGBT rights in Ohio
Legality of same-sex sexual activity
Ohio adopted its first sodomy law in 1885 and revised it to include fellatio in 1889. It became the eighth state to repeal its sodomy statute in 1974. It remained a misdemeanor to express romantic or sexual interest to another person of the same sex, but in 1979 a state court decision narrowed that provision to cover only cases in which the proposition was "unwelcome". The broad discriminatory nature of the application of the importuning law is illustrated in the State v. Thompson case. Eric Thompson made a sexual pass at a fellow jogger and, after the jogger declined, continued on his way. The jogger contacted the police, however, and Thompson was arrested and sentenced to 6 months in jail. Thompson's legal battle led to the law finally being overturned by the United States Supreme Court in the State of Ohio v. Thompson. On 26 June 2003, the United States Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas to abolish all remaining sodomy laws and statutes nationwide.
Maps LGBT rights in Ohio
Recognition of same-sex relationships
Marriage
Same-sex marriage has been legal in Ohio since June 2015.
- Obergefell v. Hodges
On June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Obergefell v. Hodges that Ohio (along with Michigan, Kentucky and Tennessee) could not deny same-sex couples the right to marry, or refuse to recognize their marriages performed elsewhere; protected under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. This ruling reversed a November 2014 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, effectively legalizing same-sex marriage in those states and nationwide.
- Defense of Marriage Act
Representative Bill Seitz introduced the Defense of Marriage Act in the state House of Representatives in 2003. It passed the House by a vote of 73-23 in December 2003 and the Senate in a 18-15 vote in January 2004. It was opposed by many Democrats in the Senate, joined by four Republicans, and Governor Bob Taft signed the legislation on February 6, 2004. The legislation was enacted in the aftermath of the Goodridge decision on November 18, 2003, in Massachusetts.
- Constitutional amendment
Ballot Issue 1 of 2004 was a constitutional amendment initiated by the Legislature and approved by a margin of 61%-38%. Governor Taft and Rep. Bill Seitz both opposed the amendment on the grounds that it was too vague. It amended Article XV, Section 11 of the Ohio Constitution to defined marriage so as to exclude same-sex couples. Official supporters were Ohio Campaign to Protect Marriage and the Traditional Marriage Crusade. Ohioans for Fairness led the opposition to the amendment. This amendment to Ohio's Constitution was later invalidated by the United States Supreme Court in Obergefell v. Hodges.
Domestic partnerships
Nine cities, the village of Yellow Springs, and the counties of Cuyahoga and Franklin offer domestic partnership registries.
Adoption and parenting
Single LGBT individuals are permitted to adopt in Ohio. Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, joint and stepchild adoption are also legal for same-sex spouses in Ohio.
Discrimination protections
There are no statewide protections in Ohio for sexual orientation and gender identity outside of state employment. Discrimination based on sexual orientation, but not gender identity, is prohibited within state employment under an executive order issued by Governor John Kasich on January 21, 2011. Thirty Ohio cities and counties have anti-discrimination ordinances prohibiting employment and housing discrimination of the basis of sexual orientation.
Hate crimes
Ohio's hate crime laws address violence based on race, color, religion or national origin, but not sexual orientation or gender identity. However, federal law does provide some protections within the State.
- Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, also known as the Matthew Shepard Act, is an American Act of Congress, passed on October 22, 2009, and signed into law by President Barack Obama on October 28, 2009, as a rider to the National Defense Authorization Act for 2010 (H.R. 2647). Conceived as a response to the murders of Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr., the measure expands the 1969 United States federal hate crime law to include crimes motivated by a victim's actual or perceived gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, or disability. The bill also removes the prerequisite that the victim be engaging in a federally protected activity like voting or going to school, gives federal authorities greater ability to engage in hate crimes investigations that local authorities choose not to pursue, provides $5 million per year in funding for fiscal years 2010 through 2012 to help state and local agencies pay for investigating and prosecuting hate crimes and requires the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) to track statistics on hate crimes based on gender and gender identity (statistics for the other groups were already tracked).
Freedom of expression
In 2012, 16-year-old high school student Maverick Couch, represented by Lambda Legal, sued the Waynesville Local School District after being told he could not come to school wearing a T-shirt with the words "Jesus is not a homophobe". The board explained their position, "Wayne Local School District Board of Education had the right to limit clothing with sexual slogans, especially in light what was then a highly charged atmosphere, in order to protect its students and enhance the educational environment. Consequently, the high school principal was well within the bounds of his authority to request that the student remove his T-shirt and refrain from wearing the T-shirt in the future.". The suit ended in a judgement in federal court in Cincinnati agreed to by all parties to the suit that affirmed Couch's right to wear the shirt to school and ordered the school district to pay $20,000 in damages and legal fees.
Gender identity and expression
Following a 1987 court case, In re Ladrach, Ohio does not allow persons born in the state to amend the sex information on their birth certificates following sex reassignment surgery.
Transgender people can, however, change their legal name/gender on their Ohio ID. In order for them to do so, they must submit a court order certifying the name change and/or a Declaration of Gender Change form signed by a physician or psychologist certifying the applicant's gender identity.
Conversion therapy
A bill to prohibit the use of conversion therapy on LGBT minors in Ohio was introduced by Senator Charleta Tavares in February 2015. The bill, however, died without any legislative action.
Local bans
On December 9, 2015, the Cincinnati City Council voted 7-2 in favor of Ordinance 373, an ordinance banning conversion therapy on minors, and it went into effect on January 9, 2016. Cincinnati became the first city in the United States to ban the use of conversion therapy on LGBT minors.
On February 7, 2017, the Toledo City Council unanimously approved a ban on conversion therapy.
On March 27, 2017, the Columbus City Council approved legislation prohibiting conversion therapy with the aim of altering the sexual orientation or gender identity of youth. Columbus became the 3rd city in Ohio to ban the use of conversion therapy on LGBT minors.
Dayton and Athens followed suit in July and August 2017, respectively.
See also
- Politics of Ohio
- LGBT rights in the United States
- Rights and responsibilities of marriages in the United States
- Equality Ohio
- Law of Ohio
References
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments